What to Look for in a Seattle Interior Designer or Architect
They ask about you before they show you anything
If a designer or architect opens with their portfolio before they’ve asked a single question about how you live, that tells you something. The questions worth listening for: How do you want to feel in this space? What’s the real reason you’re doing this project? What does home mean to you in this chapter of your life? If no one has asked you those questions yet, you haven’t met the right person.
They think about how the space will actually be lived in — before walls go up
This is one of the most common gaps I encounter in my work — and one of the most costly for clients who don’t catch it until it’s too late.
Architectural plans are drawn by people who are thinking about structure, systems, and code compliance. What they’re often not thinking about is how a person will actually move through the finished space. Where will the sofa go when that wall comes down? Does this door swing into the room in a way that makes the entry feel cramped the moment you walk in? Is there a clear, natural path from the kitchen to the dining room, or will people always be navigating around each other?
I’ve been called into projects where the architectural plans were already approved — sometimes already under construction — and the flow simply didn’t work. Doors placed without thought to furniture layout. Walls removed in ways that looked open on paper but created dead zones in practice. Rooms that were technically correct but experientially broken.
Fixing these issues after the fact is expensive. Catching them before the first nail is driven costs nothing — it just requires someone in the room who is thinking about the space from the inside out, not the outside in.
Space planning isn’t a decorating decision. It’s a structural one. And it belongs at the very beginning of any project, not as an afterthought once the bones are set.
A well-designed room starts with how you’ll live in it — not how it will look in a photograph. Flow, movement, and furniture placement have to be part of the architectural conversation, not separate from it.
Their portfolio doesn’t look like a signature style
When you scroll through a designer’s portfolio and every project feels like it came from the same hand — the same palette, the same mood, the same aesthetic repeated across different clients’ homes — that’s a signature style. It’s evidence of the designer’s taste, not the clients’.
My portfolio looks different. Not because I lack a point of view, but because each project reflects the specific person who lives in it. The calm one and the vibrant one. The spare and the layered. The collector and the minimalist. What you’ll see isn’t a style I’m known for — it’s a range of feelings, each one exactly right for the person who asked for it.
That’s the difference between a designer who executes their vision in your home and one who helps you find yours.
They insist on meeting in person — in the space
A questionnaire can tell a designer what you think you want. Being present with you in the actual space tells them what you need. I always meet in person — not as a preference, but as a methodology. There’s information in a room and a face-to-face conversation that no intake form will ever capture.
They have a point of view that goes beyond aesthetics
The designers producing the most personally resonant work have a philosophy — a set of beliefs about what design is for. Some of the most interesting work right now is shaped by neuroarchitecture — the study of how spaces affect the brain and nervous system. It shifts the question from ‘what should this look like?’ to ‘what does this need to feel like?’ The aesthetic follows from that. Not the other way around.